Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN WATER DISTRICT v. USA
as 1:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
County of Alameda-v-AMBAC Financial Group Inc.
as 4:2010cv05572
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda , City and County of San Francisco , City of Los Angeles and others
Defendant:
Ambac Financial Group, Inc., Ambac Assurance Corporation , MBIA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Alameda-v-AMBAC Financial Group Inc.
as 3:2010cv05572
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda , City and County of San Francisco , City of Los Angeles and others
Defendant:
Ambac Financial Group, Inc., Ambac Assurance Corporation , MBIA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Contra Costa County et al v. Fitch, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv05318
Plaintiff:
Contra Costa County, The City of Riverside, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside and others
Defendant:
Fitch, Inc. , Fitch Group, Inc. , Fitch Ratings, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
as 1:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv03433
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sacramento Suburban Water District v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2009at01990
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Suburban Water District
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., UBS Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
