Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Federal Trade Commission v. Success By Media Holdings Inc., et al.
as 23-3781
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INC., a corporation doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA, LLC, a limited liability company doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL and others
Defendant:
RINPARK SA, NETFORCE SEMINARS, RICHARD SLABACK and others
Not Yet Classified:
LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC also known as Scott Harris, THOMAS G SACCA, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC also known as Thomas Socca and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELANIE SUMMERS, ROBERT MEHLER, JO DEE BAER and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, et al.
as 23-3757
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INC., a corporation doing business as Success By Health, doing business as Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA, LLC, a limited liability company doing business as Success By Health doing business as Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL and others
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES D NOLAND, JR., individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC, LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC and others
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
BRENDA A. PATTERSON
Respondent:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, KRISTEN M. CLARKE and ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Scott Harry
as 22-1262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Michael Harry
FTC v. James Noland, Jr., et al
as 21-16679
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES D. NOLAND, Jr., individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC, AKA Jay Noland, AKA JD Noland, LINA NOLAND, individually and as an officer of Success by Media Holdings Inc. and Success By Media LLC, SCOTT A. HARRIS, individually and as an officer of Success By Media LLC and others
Defendant:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, SUCCESS BY MEDIA LLC, a limited liability company, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL FUNDING and others
Darrell Goss v. Scott Harris
as 21-6867
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, U.S. Supreme Court Clerk
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Scott Harris, et al
as 21-5102
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Ames, Clerk in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Peter R. Marksteiner, Clerk in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Jeffrey Atkins, Clerk in the United States Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
FTC v. James Noland, Jr., et al
as 21-15767
Petitioner / Appellant:
TEVIS SHERFIELD, JILL BOONE, DWAYNE HOSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA LLC, a limited liability company, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media, ENHANCED CAPITAL FUNDING, SUCCESS BY MEDIA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, DBA Success By Health, DBA Success By Media and others
Jason Harris v. Montoya, et al
as 21-15622
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTOYA, Unknown; CO II, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the US Supreme Court and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, Jr., Clerk of the US Supreme Court
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Helen Le v. USPS, et al
as 21-15533
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN LE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
