Cases 1 - 7 of 7
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
as 1:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Howard Merritt Sr, et al v. Advanced Spine, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:1998cv08083
Defendant:
Acromed Corporation, Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc., Alfra Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Merritt, Sr and Sandra Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIRSCHNER v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07002
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE KIRSCHNER
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WILLIAMS v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07003
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHAIKEN v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07000
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS and PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC, DEPUY, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv07001
Plaintiff:
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.