Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ortez Reyes v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Fredis Ruben Ortez Reyes
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Zahed et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Amir Zahed and Regwida Neayish
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Acting Associate Dir Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Arnous v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Manar Arnous
Defendant:
Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland, UR M. Jaddou, Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Chauhan v. Mayorkas, et al.
as 1:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
pooja chauhan
Defendant:
Secretary DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shakfeh v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 1:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Khaled Ousama Shakfeh
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ITANGISHAKA et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Alain Victor Itangishaka and Christella Girimana
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Al Ksebati v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Nada Al Ksebati
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Acting Associate Dir Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
