Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Leuer et al v. Starpoint Central School District et al
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
James Leuer, Jr. and Landon Grainy
Defendant:
Starpoint Central School District, Board of Education For The Starpoint Central School District, Dr. Sean M Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07351
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson and others
Petitioner:
Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Southwestern Central School District Board of Education et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Central School District Board of Education and Rochester City School District Board of Education
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
State of New York v. United States Department of Education et al
as 1:2020cv04260
Defendant:
United States Department of Education and Elisabeth DeVos
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK and The Board of Education for the City School District of the City of New York
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, AASA, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Board of Education of the Alexander Central School District v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv01240
Defendant:
Inge Williams and Deandre Williams
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of the Alexander Central School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
L&M Bus Corp. et al v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
as 1:2018cv01902
Plaintiff:
Alina Services Corp., L&M Bus Corp., Phillip Bus Corp. and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York doing business as New York City Department of Education and Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York doing business as The New York City Department of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Reliant Transportation, Inc., Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 553 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
IN RE Pamela Felton
as 1:2017mc02834
Defendant:
A.K.A. Bobby, A.K.A. John and Jean Doe, Affordable Self Storage of NY and others
Respondent:
Pamela Felton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New York City Employees Retirement System et al v. Petroleo Brasileirio S.A. -Petrobras et al
as 1:2015cv02192
Plaintiff:
New York City Employees Retirement System , New York City Police Pension Fund , Board of Education Retirement System of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
Petroleo Brasileirio S.A. -Petrobras, Petrobras Global Finance B.V., Maria Das Gracas Silva Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. Litigation
as 1:2015mc00040
Plaintiff:
Perry Ciraulu, State Teachers Retirement Systems of Ohio, Bernard Priever and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Sjunde Ap-Fonden
Petitioner:
Kevin Patton
New York City Employees Retirement System et al v. American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
New York City Employees Retirement System , New York City Police Pension Fund , New York City Police Officers' Variable Supplements Fund and others
Defendant:
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., ARC Properties Operating Partnership, Nicholas S. Schorsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
