Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Keith Stutes et al v. Gulfport Energy Corp et al
as LAE/2:18-cv-00691
Plaintiff:
Keith Stutes
Defendant:
Gulfport Energy Corp , Hilcorp Energy Co , Jones Co Ltd and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Jeff Landry , LA Dept of Natural Resources and State of Louisiana
Keith Stutes et al v. Gulfport Energy Corp et al
as 6:2018cv00691
Plaintiff:
Keith Stutes
Defendant:
Gulfport Energy Corp , Hilcorp Energy Co , Jones Co Ltd and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
State of Louisiana and LA Dept of Natural Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co v. Permanent Easement for 7.053, et al
as 17-8060
Plaintiff - Respondent:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Petitioner:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 7.053 ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR 1.709 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 8.551 ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS, KING ARTHUR ESTATES and RIOTHAMUS CORP
Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al v. Sec Pa Dept Environmental Prot, et al
as 17-1533
Petitioner:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA VAN ROSSUM, the Delaware Riverkeeper
Respondent:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Not Party - Intervenor Respondent:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Stutes et al v. Gulfport Energy Corp et al
as 6:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Keith Stutes and State of Louisiana
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Jeff Landry , LA Dept of Natural Resources and Thomas F Harris
Defendant:
Gulfport Energy Corp, Hilcorp, Jones Co Ltd and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Petro-Hunt L L C, American Trading & Production Corp, Apache Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co v. Permanent Easements For 1,7320
as 14-1710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
PERMANENT EASEMENTS FOR 1,7320 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 5, 4130 ACRES IN SHOHOLA TOWNSHIP, PIKE COUNRY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS 49.00-1-15, 49.00-1-19, 49.00-1-20 AND 62.00-01-57, TWI and WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Defendant - Appellant:
FOX HOLLOW ESTATES
Lyondell Chemical Company, et al v. Albemarle Corporation, et al
as 11-40218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO, EPEC POLYMERS INC, TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Lyondell Chemical Co v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40061
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40060
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO, EPEC CORP and EPEC POLYMERS INC
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Lyondell Chemical Co, et al v. Albemarle Corp, et al
as 08-40025
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
EPEC POLYMERS INC, EPEC CORP and EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORP, PPG INDUSTRIES INC and CHEVRON USA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO, formerly known as Tenneco Inc and OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUBRIZOL CORP
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, formerly known as Rhone Poulenc AG Company Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
