Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
KONG v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05970
Defendant:
IRENE R. MILLER, BRIAN M. LEVITT, MARK L. MITCHELL and others
Petitioner:
YAN SIONG KONG
Paine-Mantha v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Irene Miller, Joseph H. Moglia, Allan R. Tessler and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Paine-Mantha
Garrison v. TD Ameritrade Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv02850
Defendant:
Irene R. Miller, Brian M. Levitt, Mark L. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Garrison
LITWIN v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03569
Defendant:
IRENE R. MILLER, BRIAN M. LEVITT, JOSEPH H. MOGLIA and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
ROTH v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03425
Defendant:
IRENE MILLER, JOSEPH H. MOGLIA, ALLAN R. TESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARC ROTH
Stein v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Irene R. Miller, Brian M. Levitt, Joseph H. Moglia and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Kent v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Irene Miller, Joseph H. Moglia, Allan R. Tessler and others
I. (Anonymous) v. The Office of Court Administra
as 20-714
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen McNeely, individually and as Caseworker for NYC-ACS, Carmalita Cyrus, individually and as Supervisor #1 for NYC-ACS, Jeanette Vega-Alvarez, (LIC #041405) individually and as NYC-ACS Supervisor FSU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miriam Schvimmer and Israel Schvimmer
Reeder v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05964
Defendant:
Jan Zijderveld, Michael F. Sanford, James A. Mitarotonda and others
Plaintiff:
Adriane Reeder
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
