Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Richard Polak v. Robert Laney
as 21-1055
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Laney
Defendant:
Clinton Gormley, John Does 1-100, both individually and officially as officers of the Omaha Police Department, The City of Omaha, Nebraska, a political subdivision of the State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Polak
Robert Bruning, et al v. City of Omaha
as 20-2581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Bruning and Sharon Bruning, a married couple
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Omaha, Nebraska
Metropolitan Omaha Property, et al v. City of Omaha Nebraska
as 20-1851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hillcrest Apartments, Pierce Carpenter and Metropolitan Omaha Property Owners Association, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Omaha Nebraska
Metropolitan Omaha Property, et al v. City of Omaha Nebraska
as 20-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hillcrest Apartments, Pierce Carpenter and Metropolitan Omaha Property Owners Association, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Omaha Nebraska
Shane Harrington, et al v. Susan Strong, et al
as 19-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
H & S Club Omaha, Inc., Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Aimee Melton, Michelle Bang, John and Jane Doe, Nebraska State Patrol Officers #1-#800, In Their Individual Capacities and Official Capacities as Employees of the State of Nebraska and others
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America and City of Omaha, Nebraska v. American Laboratories, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
United States of America and City of Omaha, Nebraska and United States of America and City of Omaha, Nebraska
Defendant:
American Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
In re SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 3:2008cv00856
Plaintiff:
Sammy Esses, Sammy Esses, Sammy Esses and others
Defendant:
SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc., SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc., SIRF Technology Holdings, Inc. and others
Movant:
Alex Meruelo, Alex Meruelo, Matthew Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
