Cases 1 - 10 of 1,457
Miller v. Busch et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Defendant:
August A. Busch, Tomas Hartgrewe, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Uchendu
as 24-4082
Defendant:
CLINTON CHUKWUDI UCHENDU
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Haymount Urgent Care PC v. GoFund Advance, LLC
as 24-2003
:
ALPHA RECOVERY PARTNERS, LLC, ROBERT A. CLINTON, JR., individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, MERCHANT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH KROEN and YISROEL C. GETTER
Plaintiff:
INDIGO INSTALLATIONS, INC. and CHRISTOPHER A. TURRENTINE, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Haymount Urgent Care PC v. GoFund Advance, LLC
as 24-1981
:
JOSEPH KROEN, FUNDING 123 LLC, YISROEL C. GETTER and others
Plaintiff:
INDIGO INSTALLATIONS, INC. and CHRISTOPHER A. TURRENTINE, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Croney v. Doe
as 24-1937
Defendant:
Deputy CAHILL, Dept. of Mental Health; Marcy Correctional Facility, DANNIELLE MEDBURRY, Deputy Superintendent of Mental Health; Marcy Correctional Facility, SANTO PITRO, Chief of Mental Health; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN CRONEY
Hartwig et al v. Clinton, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2024cv11357
Defendant:
Robert Cannon, Clinton, Charter Township of, James H. Elrod and others
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Hartwig [E-filer] and Thomas G. Hartwig
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Josey v. Bell
as 24-1747
Plaintiff:
DEREK JOSEY
Defendant:
Correctional Officer DUSTIN BELL, Clinton Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer JEREMY TUCKER, Clinton Correctional Facility, Sgt. JOHN DOE, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Clinton County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 24-1686
Plaintiff:
CLINTON COUNTY, NY and COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., OPTUMRX INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
