Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Samhat v. Samhat et al
as 1:2018cv02507
Plaintiff:
Karen Samhat
Defendant:
David Samhat, Jody Meyer Yazici, Douglas B. Wexler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, et al v. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC , DAVID ERTEL , BRIAN BOMSTEIN and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al v. Rosado
as 1:2016cv21386
Plaintiff:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , David Ertel , Brian E. Bomstein and others
Defendant:
Randal Thomas Rosado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation
as 2:2014md02591
Plaintiff:
Eagle-View Dairy, LLC, Michael D. Tiede, Frank Hagenmaier and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Michael Miller, PC, Call & Gentry Law Group, LLC, Gellhaus & Gellhaus, PC and others
Other:
Harry G. Barber, Jr. and Sharon Brunet
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Defendant:
Bunge North America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Nolan Law Group and Lowe Eklund Wakefield Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Buckley et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03043
Plaintiff:
Bessie Buckley and Thomas Carr
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
United States of America v. Carr et al
as 2:2012mc00141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Craig Thomas Carr
Garnishee:
Boeing QDRO Administration
Rigo v. Kason Industries, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00064
Defendant:
Kason Industries, Inc , Peter A Katz , Component Hardware Group, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Rigo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Craig Carr
as 10-30371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS CARR
USA v. Thomas Carr
as 08-2008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS CARR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
