Cases 1 - 10 of 4,439
TORRES v. WORMUTH
as 1:2024cv02652
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA TORRES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Higuerey et al
as 3:2024cv01423
Defendant:
377 Ferrer, LLC, Valerie Cintron-Concepcion, La Terraza de San Juan and others
Plaintiff:
Randa Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Valdovinos-Torres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4913
Petitioner:
MARIA ESTHELA GARCIA-CISNEROS, ARELY VALDOVINOS-GARCIA, KARINA VALDOVINOS-GARCIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez De Torres, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4863
Petitioner:
KASSY CAMILA TORRES GONZALEZ, KATLEEN MICHELE TORRES GONZALEZ and SANDRA IVETH GONZALEZ DE TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant:
JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones, et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.
as 24-4783
Defendant:
MICHAEL BOUDREAUX, in his capacity as Sheriff, County of Tulare, California, MICHAEL TORRES, Individually and in his capacity as Deputy Sheriff, County of Tulare, California and COUNTY OF TULARE
Plaintiff:
ANGELA ANDERSON and MIKAL JONES
Quiroz-Torres v. Garland
as 24-4700
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
PABLO QUIROZ-TORRES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
