Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
US v. Cadden
as 21-2003
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Wright
as 21-1704
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Wright, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Abdul Wright, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Abdul Khaliq, a/k/a David Wright
Interested Party: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
US v. Cadden
as 21-1602
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Chin
as 21-1574
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: GLENN A. CHIN
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Rovinski
as 20-1883
Defendant / Appellee: NICHOLAS ALEXANDER ROVINSKI
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Trustees of Boston University v. Kingbright Electronic Co.
as 20-1960
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: KINGBRIGHT CORP. and KINGBRIGHT ELECTRONIC CO., LTD.
US v. Thomas
as 20-1051
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant: MICHELLE L. THOMAS
Appellee: UNITED STATES
US v. Chin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1050
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant: KATHY S. CHIN
Appellee: UNITED STATES
US v. Conigliaro
as 19-1645
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY CONIGLIARO
US v. Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1644
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON P. CARTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?