Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00203
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VRM Vendor Resource Management v. Clifton Edward Doc Jones et al
as 2:2017cv08295
Defendant: Emma Bailey, Clifton Edwards Doc Jones and Does
Plaintiff: VRM Vendor Resource Management
VRM v. Clifton Edward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv07791
Defendant: Glenn Bailey, DOES, Clifton Edward and others
Plaintiff: VRM
VRM Vendor Resource Management v. Clifton Edward Doc Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv07010
Defendant: Emma Bailey, Clifton Edwards Doc Jones and Does
Plaintiff: VRM Vendor Resource Management
VRM v. Clifton Edward Doc Jones et al
as 2:2017cv06897
Defendant: Clifton Edward Doc Jones and Does
Plaintiff: VRM
Briggs v. VRM Group aka Vision Receivable Management Group, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00787
Plaintiff: Roslynn Briggs
Defendant: VRM Group aka Vision Receivable Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv10096
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Conner et al v. Vidgen Receivables Management, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04405
Plaintiff: Crystal Conner and Crystal Conner
Defendant: Vigden Receivables Management, LLC, VRM Collections, LP and Branden Vigliotti
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bylak v. Maximum Recovery Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03000
Plaintiff: Catherine R. Bylak and Catherine R. Bylak
Defendant: Maximum Recovery Solutions, Inc. and VRM Collections L.P.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00558
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?