Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
Nicholson et al v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Douglas Grimes, Jeff Nicholson, Greg Serbon and others
Defendant:
Herbert Jr Smith, Lavetta Sparks-Wade, Carolyn D Rogers and others
Intervenor:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
BAKER et al v. OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00139
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. BAKER and WADE R. WOLF
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. DURHAM and OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
BAKER et al v. OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00049
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. BAKER and WADE R. WOLF
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. DURHAM and OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
WADE v. WELLPOINT, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00357
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WADE
Defendant:
WELLPOINT, INC., ANGELA F. BRALY, WAYNE DEVEYDT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
