Cases 1 - 10 of 31
USA v. William Leonard
as 24-11435
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM DANIEL LEONARD
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Skurkey v. Daniel, et al
as 23-6014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN V. SKURKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DANIEL, PAUL E. QUIGLEY and ANNE THOMAS
Skurkey v. Daniel et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
John V Skurkey
Defendant:
William Daniel, Paul E Quigley and Anne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kely Villatoro-Rivas, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70586
Petitioner:
KELY ANABELLY VILLATORO-RIVAS and WILLIAM DANIEL VILLATORO VILLATORO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
David Greco v. Gurbir Grewal, et al
as 21-1035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. GRECO
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND PREPAREDNESS, a Cabinet Level Department of the State of New Jersey, DONALD B. GANSKY, Detective Sergeant, Gloucester Township Police Department, JOHN DOE 2-10, (fictitious names) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
JILL S. MAYER, Acting Camden County Prosecutor
USA v. William Gee
as 20-10047
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DANIEL GEE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hardin v. Jaques, et al
as 19-1201
Respondent / Appellee:
PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and TERRY JAQUES, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DANIEL HARDIN
USA v. William Boone
as 19-3032
Defendant / Appellant:
William Daniel Boone
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
