Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff: Ali Ader
Defendant: NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-7973
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, ESQ.
Defendant / Appellee: META PLATFORMS, INC., ALPHABET INC., GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP and others
Benjamin Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant: Benjamin Woodhouse, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee: Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07000
Plaintiff: Benjamin Woodhouse, Esq.
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
WOODHOUSE v. META PLATFORMS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01924
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE
Defendant: META PLATFORMS INC., ALPHABET INC., NIKE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MOSQUITO HUNTERS, LLC v. KELWOOD, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv05033
Respondent: DANIEL WOODHOUSE, JEFF KELLY and KELWOOD, INC.
Petitioner: MOSQUITO HUNTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
WOODHOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-97876
Plaintiff: WOODHOUSE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
WOODHOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-80585
Plaintiff: WOODHOUSE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
WOODHOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-80771
Plaintiff: WOODHOUSE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?