Cases 1 - 10 of 44
MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLP v. VENABLE et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
MCALLISTER & QUINN, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
JESSICA VENABLE, SCOTT TOMINOVICH, CHRIS FISH and others
PAYNE v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03077
Plaintiff:
JASON PAYNE
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, KIRAN AHUJA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
DR. S. STANLEY YOUNG, S. STANLEY YOUNG and LOUIS ANTHONY COX, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
YOUNG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2021cv00739
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
D'ANGELO v. BANK OF DENE et al
as 1:2021mc00001
Defendant:
MICHAEL STEPHEN YOUNG, Bank of Dene and Prime Business Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Angelo
BUTLER et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2020cv02514
Plaintiff:
YOUNG HWA CHUNG KIM, CHUN KOOK KIM and DANI BUTLER
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA and NORTH KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
VOTE FORWARD et al v. DEJOY et al
as 1:2020cv02405
Plaintiff:
VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS, PADRES & JOVENES UNIDOS, VOTE FORWARD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LOUIS DEJOY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRUNS et al v. USAA et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
MARK A. DAVIS, ROBERT WILKIE, DALTON BRYANT, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BRUNS and JEREMY BRUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2019cv03526
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SEEMA VERMA, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
KATINA PETROPOULOS, MARIA YAKOVCHIK, ANDREA YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
