Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bonilla Mendez v. Houghton et al
as 1:2020cv05838
Petitioner:
Lida Eugenia Bonilla Mendez
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Tim Houghton
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mackenzie Brown, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 20-15568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACKENZIE BROWN, a single woman
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA and ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a constitutionally created body corporate, DBA University of Arizona
Defendant:
RICHARD A. RODRIQUEZ and RITA RODRIQUEZ
Not Yet Classified:
LIDA DEGROOTE
RAFIEE et al v. WHITAKER et al
as 1:2018cv02645
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, KAY LEOPOLD, MATTHEW GEORGE WHITAKER and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD RAFIEE and LIDA KHALAFI
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans v. Estate of Lida J. Osberg et al
as 8:2018cv00240
Defendant:
Does and Estate of Lida J. Osberg
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial For Lutherans
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Avetisyan et al
as 1:2017cv04275
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, AOM Medical Supply, Inc., AVA Custom Supply Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Issuance of Apostille for Lida Feto
as 2:2017mc00028
Petitioner:
Lida Feto
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3823
Defendant - Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nominal Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
