Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Korman v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 9:2011cv81163
Plaintiff:
John Korman
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC, Thomas L Wind, Aurora Bank FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. De Cespedes et al
as 1:2011cv22917
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos M. De Cespedes, Martha L. Lazaro and Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Carr et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv12741
Plaintiff:
Mark Carr and Martha Carr
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , MERSCORP, Inc., AMERICAS WHOLESALE LENDER and others
Miskinis v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv12572
Plaintiff:
Kestutis Miskinis
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , MERSCORP, Inc., AMERICAS WHOLESALE LENDER and others
Objector:
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of CWALT 2004-ECCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Carr et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv12454
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc., AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CARR and MARTHA CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation v. Swatloski, Kevin et al
as 3:2010cv00818
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation
Defendant:
Kevin Swatloski , Jill M. Swatloski , Midland Funding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Deane G Kaminski v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01468
Defendant:
DOES, Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation, NDEx West LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deane G Kaminski
Burkes v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
Willie Burkes
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
