Cases 11 - 14 of 14
United States of America v. Harrell, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-2153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
J. B. HARRELL, JR., and his wife, Marie S. Harrell, MELISSA LEIGH HARRELL, Unknown Owner, DONALD HARRELL, and his Wife, Maryana N. Harrell and others
Defendant:
99,223.7238 ACRES OF LAND, more or less in Sandoval and Rio Arriba Counties, New Mexico, MAGMA POWER COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation - Unknown Owner, ERNESTINE BIRDSEY PHINNEY and others
Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. 3.543 Acres of Real Property in Adams County, Colorado et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2008cv00657
Plaintiff:
Colorado Interstate Gas Company and Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Defendant:
3.543 Acres of Real Property in Adams County, Colorado, Cordillera Corporation, Zions First National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 42.67 Acres of Property Located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
42.67 Acres of Property Located in Maricopa County, Pulte Development Corporation, 10,000 West, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 Natural Gas Act
B. Willis, C.P.A. v. BNSF Railway, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-5015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
B. WILLIS, C.P.A., INC., an Oklahoma corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a foregin corporation and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, an Oklahoma corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.