Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Vakili et al v. First Commercial Bank et al
as 2:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Marjan Vakili, Marjan Vakili, Marjan Vakili and others
Defendant:
First Commercial Bank, Colonial Bank, Charles F. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Abrams et al v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, Sr., Cleveland Abrams, Sr., Adell M. Adams and others
Defendant:
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp., Ciba-Geigy Corp., Novartis, Ltd., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
King v. Parcel of land located in Section 19, Township 18, Range 12, Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gladys F. King
Defendant:
Parcel of land located in Section 19, Township 18, Range 12, Randolph County, Alabama, Joyce Jones, Patricia Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 19 Acres of Land More or Less Located in Section 32, T6S, R2W, Mobile County, Alabama
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC and Southeast Supply Header, LLC
Defendant:
19 Acres of Land More or Less Located in Section 32, T6S, R2W, Mobile County, Alabama, Donald F. Schultz, Erin Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Abrams et al v. Olin Corporation, et al
as 1:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, John W. Adams, Jessie J. Adams and others
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Olin Chloralkali Products Company, Arch Chemicals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Riverside Texaco et al v. Occidental Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
Annie R Whiteside, Annie P Thompson, William D Ricks and others
Defendant:
David Ryskoski and Occidental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
