Cases 21 - 30 of 35
ING Bank FSB v. William H Collins et al
as 2:2012cv00016
Defendant:
William H Collins and Does
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
Larrieu et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2011cv06167
Plaintiff:
David E. Larrieu and Deborah Larrieu
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , Universal Wholesale Financial, Inc. and Creative Escrow Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larrieu et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 4:2011cv06167
Plaintiff:
David E. Larrieu and Deborah Larrieu
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB, Universal Wholesale Financial, Inc. and Creative Escrow Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ING Bank, fsb v Mikels
as 2:2011cv02400
Defendant:
Marshall-Edwards Mikels and Cecline Mikels
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, fsb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ING Bank FSB v. Anat Arbib et al
as 2:2011cv06930
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
Defendant:
Shaul Arbib, Does I through X, Inclusive, Anat Arbib and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Eric Cannon v. ING Bank, FSB, et al
as 11-13299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
ING BANK, FSB and BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS
ING BANK, FSB et al v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv01140
Plaintiff:
ING BANK, FSB and AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE, N.A. and MOHAMMED ODUNOWO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2011cv01989
Plaintiff:
Eric Cannon
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB and Bank of America Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ING Bank, FSB v. Ali Sepehri et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Does, Ali Sepehri and Lava Vahdanian Sepehri
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB
Van Krieken v. ING Bank FSB, ING Direct.
as 6:2010cv06419
Counter Claimant:
ING Bank FSB and ING Direct
Defendant:
ING Bank FSB and ING Direct
Counter Defendant:
John M. Van Krieken
Plaintiff:
John M. Van Krieken
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
