Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Mat Mora v. Mauricio Contreras et al
as 2:2015cv05015
Defendant:
Mauricio Contreras and Does
Plaintiff:
Mat Mora
Bank of America N.A. et al v. Contreras
as 5:2015cv02961
Plaintiff:
Bank of America N.A. and Irwin Welker
Defendant:
Fabio A. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel Contreras et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv04216
Plaintiff:
Miguel Contreras and Arcelia Gutierrez
Defendant:
Does, EMC Mortgage Corporation, JP Morgan Chase N.A. and others
Contreras v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
John Contreras
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Quality Loan Service Corp. and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Contreras v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00773
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Contreras
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Contreras v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 4:2014cv02294
Plaintiff:
Celia Contreras
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Contreras v. SFMC Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02340
Plaintiff:
Janet Velez Contreras
Defendant:
SFMC Inc , CitiMortgage Inc , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramiro Contreras v. JPMorgan Chase National Association et al
as 5:2014cv01145
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Contreras
Defendant:
Does, Federal National Mortgage Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association and others
Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA v. Cordero-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA
Defendant:
Elvin Omar Cordero-Rodriguez and Rebeca Contreras-De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Gomez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv02056
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Regional Service Corps
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Gomez and Rita Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
