Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Okanogan County et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Okanogan County , Wilbur G Hallauer , Josephine P Hallauer and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Ken Salazar, United States Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Chappel v. Mortgage Electronic RegistrationRegistration et al
as 3:2010cv05088
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic RegistrationRegistration, Quality Loan Service Corp., Kevin McArthy and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy P. Chappel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
McCann et al v. Quality Loan Service Corp et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael P McCann and Diane L McCann
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corp and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Verhaag v. Windermere Real Estate et al
as 2:2009cv00374
Plaintiff:
Dan G Verhaag, Sr
Defendant:
Windermere Real Estate, Cary Lodge Partnership, Donald P Cary and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tissue v. Citifinancial Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Annette P Tissue
Defendant:
Citifinancial Inc, Quicken Loans Inc and Country Wide Home Loans Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stauss et al v. Klickitat County
as 2:2008cv03080
Plaintiff:
Forrest P Stauss, Victoria A Dyer, John E Nelson and others
Defendant:
Klickitat County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA, et al v. Ecology WA Dept of, et al
as 2:2001cv00047
Defendant:
Karl J Schumak, Debra James, Paul E Longworth and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Stephanie Stika
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Skokomish Indian Tri, et al v. USA, et al
as 3:1999cv05606
Plaintiff:
Skokomish Indian Tribe , Denny S Hurtado , Gordon A James and others
Defendant:
Tacoma Public Utility, Tacoma City of , William Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
