Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sharp v. Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Linda R. Sharp
Defendant:
Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc., D. Ken Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bey v. Pettis et al
as 3:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Rashidi Nisu Bey
Defendant:
Rufus G. Pettis and David F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rains et al v. SQM North American Corporation
as 4:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rains and William rains
Defendant:
SQM North American Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rains et al v. SQM North American Corporation
as 5:2010cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rains and William Rains
Defendant:
SQM North American Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Case Opened in Error
as 7:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
2433 South Boulevard, LLC, LORRAINE ANGEL, Michael Austin and others
Receiver:
William K. Angel
Petitioner:
Julie Hunter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
HARRIS et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00925
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HARRIS and ADRIANE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., SUNTRUST BANKS INC. and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Bradley et al
as 7:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Darrell A. Bradley, Tonka F. Bradley, Richard Britton and others
Defendant:
L. M. Sandler and Sons, Sandler at Shallotte LLC, Wakefield Development Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701 Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
