Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Smith et al v. Apex Mortgage Group, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith and Priscilla D. Smith
Defendant:
Apex Mortgage Group, LLC, William Striplin, Jr. and Beatrice Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
De Leon v. Apex Mortgage Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Substitute Trustee, Arnold Mendoza, Apex Mortgage Corp. and Arnold Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Adeline De Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Apex Mortgage Partners v. Quinde
as 7:2018cv03466
Defendant:
Maria C. Quinde
Plaintiff:
Apex Mortgage Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. THOMAS R. INGE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv04106
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
THOMAS R. INGE ENTERPRISES, INC., ANN P. TANTILLO and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ARQUB et al
as 1:2011cv06178
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
RAFAT ARQUB and MAIKEL BESHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. FUENTES
as 2:2011cv05096
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
YULISSA FUENTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. SCHETTER BROTHERS REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 1:2011cv03793
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
SCHETTER BROTHERS REAL ESTATE LLC and TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. PRUDEN TOOL AND DIE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02026
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
PRUDEN TOOL AND DIE COMPANY, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. CHIGOM, LLP
as 2:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
CHIGOM, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ATKINS et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
HARRIET ATKINS, KA-NOT TAVERN, INC. and AND UNKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
