Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Roderic Schmidt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Br, et al
as 13-17653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERIC MALCOLM SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE, JOHN DOE and JANE ROE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN A. SCHMIDT, Successor Trustee
Tidwell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2013cv02621
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Tidwell
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance LLC, JP Morgan Chase Home Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Roderic Schmidt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Br, et al
as 13-15841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERIC MALCOLM SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE, JOHN DOE and JANE ROE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN A. SCHMIDT, Successor Trustee
Schmidt v. Coldwell Banker Residential et al
as 5:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
Roderic Malcolm Schmidt
Defendant:
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage , John Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
M. Paul Wehling et al v. Robert M. Costello et al
as 2:2010cv02923
Defendant:
John Bouzane, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company, Michael J. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maloney and M. Paul Wehling
Jones et al v. Mystic Harbour Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv01047
Plaintiff:
Warren S. Jones, Jr. and Gale S. Jones
Defendant:
Mystic Harbour Corporation, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage, John H. Burbage, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wheeler et al v. Leonard et al
as 8:2008cv00774
Plaintiff:
Melony Wheeler, Elwood Scott and Ramona Scott
Defendant:
Gregory Leonard, Stephanie Leonard, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage and others
Counter Claimant:
Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage and Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage
Counter Defendant:
Elwood Scott and Ramona Scott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
