Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, WV et al
as 2:2017cv04214
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, D. Lane McMillion, Dale L. McMillion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Equitrans, L.P. v. An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by Casandra Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.2) et al
as 5:2016cv00045
Defendant:
An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by Casandra Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.2) , An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall Couny, West Virginia, owned by Sidney Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.3) and An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by John J. Ebert, Jr. (Parcel ID No. 05-19-20.1)
Plaintiff:
Equitrans, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
