Cases 1 - 10 of 24
BROWN v. Kay Parkview LLC
as 5:2020cv06187
Defendant:
Kay Builders Inc and Kay Parkview LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. McNett
as 1:2020cv02343
Defendant:
Michelle McNett
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
The United States of America v. Pritchard
as 1:2017cv02074
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Michele L. Pritchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Hall et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 4:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hall and Michele Hall
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOMMEL
as 5:2016cv06560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHELLE L. DOMMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OLVERA et al
as 2:2016cv05655
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHELLE OLVERA and JOSE H. TORRES-LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEAL et al
as 3:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RALPH H. DEAL, KATHY J. DEAL and MICHELE J. DEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. O'NELL et al
as 2:2014cv00190
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GLORIA J. O'NELL and MICHELE D. O'NELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LIBERTY PLACE RETAIL ASSOCIATES, L.P. v. MICHEL PERFUME SHOPPE, INC.
as 2:2013cv06111
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY PLACE RETAIL ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Defendant:
MICHEL PERFUME SHOPPE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
