Cases 101 - 110 of 2,022
Blake v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01896
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Blake
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doddato v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01897
Plaintiff:
Samantha D. Doddato
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toney v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01875
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Toney
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Antonio v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01587
Plaintiff:
Gilda D'Antonio
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Quality Distribution, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
Peyton Walker , Shane Walker and Chelsea Walker
Defendant:
Quality Distribution, Inc. , QC Energy Resources, Inc. , Quality Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Quality Distribution, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01518
Plaintiff:
Shannon Walker
Defendant:
Quality Distribution, Inc. , QC Energy Resources, Inc. , Quality Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Quality Distribution, Inc.
as 5:2017cv01517
Plaintiff:
Martha R. Walker and Jack Walker
Defendant:
Quality Distribution, Inc. , QC Energy Resources, Inc. , Quality Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridpath et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Linda Ridpath and Michael D. Ridpath
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norman v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Verna D Norman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv00643
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Cook and Elmer D. Cook
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
