Torts - Injury Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 131 - 140 of 264
Cashman-Foster v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11507
Plaintiff: Donna Lois Cashman-Foster
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grooms et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11294
Plaintiff: Lois Lorriene Grooms and Richard Orson Grooms
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graff v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10998
Plaintiff: Lois D. Graff
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10485
Plaintiff: Lois A. Horton
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlson v. American Medical Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv10095
Plaintiff: Lois A. Carlson
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10136
Plaintiff: Lois Rowan
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lees v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08881
Plaintiff: Lois Myra Lees
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robillard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08391
Plaintiff: Lois Robillard
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lankford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08288
Plaintiff: Lois A. Lankford
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atteberry et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06800
Plaintiff: Lois A. Atteberry and David Atteberry
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?