Cases 141 - 150 of 1,139
LARRABEE v. BRAY
as 1:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L LARRABEE, SR
Defendant:
DANIEL F BRAY
Counter Defendant:
NOR'WESTER F/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NUZZO et al v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
KEITH NUZZO and ANDREA NUZZO
Defendant:
EXACTECH INC and EXACTECH US INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUSSELL v. CHENEVERT
as 2:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
JULIA RUSSELL
Defendant:
PHILLIP AUGUSTUS CHENEVERT, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHENG et al v. NEUMANN et al
as 2:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
DANA CHENG and EPOCH GROUP INC doing business as EPOCH MEDIA GROUP
Defendant:
MAINE PEOPLES ALLIANCE doing business as BEACON and DAN NEUMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUTKA v. TAMAKI
as 2:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RUTKA
Defendant:
ATSUSHI TAMAKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. MRH CORP et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
BROCKE ROBINSON
Defendant:
EASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS doing business as NORTHERN LIGHT HEALTH and MRH CORP doing business as NORTHERN LIGHT MAYO HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
GUAMAN TENEMAZA v. HORCH ROOFING INC
as 1:2021cv00145
Defendant:
HORCH ROOFING INC
Plaintiff:
SEGUNDO PEDRO GUAMAN TENEMAZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARDITO v. SOLVAY SA et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Defendant:
SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA LLC and SOLVAY SA
Plaintiff:
MARK ARDITO
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
BATCHELDER v. GODFREY RICH & ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2021cv00114
Defendant:
GODFREY RICH & ASSOCIATES doing business as COLEMAN POWER SPORTS INC and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D BATCHELDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA
as 2:2021cv00113
Defendant:
CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA doing business as WALDOBORO CHIROPRACTIC & SPA PA doing business as WALDOBORO CHIROPRACTIC & MASSAGE
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
