Cases 171 - 180 of 292
BURNETTE v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72102
Plaintiff:
CONWAY H. BURNETTE
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COBB v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72104
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. COBB, SR.
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72107
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JOHNSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GOLDSBOROUGH v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72106
Plaintiff:
DIANA GOLDSBOROUGH
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROWN v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72101
Plaintiff:
ALVESTER BROWN
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jenks et al v. New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jenks and Melissa Jenks
Defendant:
New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Inc., Breann M. Thompson, Checkered Flag Snack Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GULLEY et al v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv67102
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GULLEY and NANCY GULLEY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO.,, E.L.STEBBINGS & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
National Association of Forensic Counselors v. Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers et al
as 1:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
National Association of Forensic Counselors
Defendant:
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New Hampshire Chapter of the Association for Treatment of Sexual Abusers The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Franklin County, Kentucky v. American International South I, et al
as 09-5319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, on behalf of itself and a class similarly situated political subdivisions
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO., AIG CASUALTY COMPANY, COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Franklin County, Kentucky v. American International South I, et al
as 09-5319
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SOUTH INSURANCE CO. and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, KY, on behalf of itself and a class similarly situated political subdivisions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
