Cases 11 - 20 of 226
Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal et al
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Debbie Heathcock
Defendant:
Speed Intermodal, Srikanth Vangala, Freedom 1 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Goal v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 4:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
Diandra Goal
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Hufford v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
David Hufford and Lisa Hufford
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perkins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Alberson v. Contract Freighters Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
James Alberson
Defendant:
Contract Freighters Inc and Gary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
King v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv01212
Plaintiff:
Patricia King
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Johnson v. O&F Logistics LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Defendant:
Hector Perez Padron and O&F Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Chad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrett v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
