Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Pratt et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08134
Plaintiff:
Cassaundra Pratt and Bill Pratt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07814
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Lindon and Bill Johns
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morriss et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07870
Plaintiff:
Francine Morriss and Bill Morriss
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Billings v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07304
Plaintiff:
Mary Billings
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vogtner et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06387
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Vogtner and Bill Vogtner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06238
Plaintiff:
Sheila Phillips and Bill Faulkner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Thomas Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2016cv05623
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davidson
Defendant:
Thomas Memorial Hospital, Healthport Technologies, LLC , John Doe Billing Companies 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Fetner et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05568
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Fetner and Bill Fetner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04925
Plaintiff:
Skip Dean
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. , Healthport Technologies, LLC and John Doe Billing Companies 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Fetzer et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03149
Plaintiff:
Sharon Fetzer and Bill Fetzer
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
