Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Bowles v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12914
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Jane Bowles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06556
Plaintiff:
Audrey G. Bowles
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03922
Plaintiff:
Heidi L. Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26063
Plaintiff:
Colleen K. Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15406
Plaintiff:
Johanna Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv08635
Plaintiff:
Diane E. Bowles
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07774
Plaintiff:
Wanda J. Bowles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02905
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Bowling and Phillip Bowling
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elton et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32913
Plaintiff:
Susannah Elton , Sharon Moffit , Pamela Balak and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31933
Plaintiff:
Tanya S. Bowles and Orbie Bowles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
