Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Wrenn-Castillo et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03875
Plaintiff:
Gloria Wrenn-Castillo and Carlos Castillo
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espinoza et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03374
Plaintiff:
Lucina Espinoza and Carlos Espinoza
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michiel Rodriguez and Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zayas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12439
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Hope Zayas and Carlos Zayas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12386
Plaintiff:
Angela Contreras and Carlos Contreras
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv11847
Plaintiff:
Lorena David and Carlos Martinez
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penate et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07005
Plaintiff:
Milagros Penate and Carlos Penate
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collazos et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06305
Plaintiff:
Judith Collazos and Carlos Collazos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04216
Plaintiff:
Angela Rodriguez and Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03780
Plaintiff:
Michelle D. Clark and Carlos D. Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
