Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Clark v. Regis Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00558
Defendant:
Regis Corporation doing business as SmartStyle Hair Salons by Regis and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lewis Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00871
Plaintiff:
Catessa Lashayla Clark
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Clark v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Byron Ray Clark
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Clark v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Bridget Clark
Defendant:
John Does I-III and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Clark et al v. Wafer
as 1:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
August Reimoninq and William Clark
Defendant:
Marqui Wafer and Marquis Wafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Lard Oil Company, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ramsay Clark
Defendant:
Lard Oil Company, Inc., John Does 1-10 and ACM Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickens v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
William Dickens and Karla Dickens
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc., Carquest Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Vaughters v. Wilson et al
as 3:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
Marcus Vaughters
Defendant:
Clark L. Wilson, Jr. and John Doe's 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Clark
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke County, Mississippi v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Clarke County, Mississippi
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
