Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Torres et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv29741
Plaintiff:
Felicita Torres , Joann Stevens-Tronson , Sue Stevenson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24780
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Gill and Everette Gill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Coloplast Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv24032
Plaintiff:
Hilda Gill
Defendant:
Coloplast Corporation, Tutogen Medical, Inc., Mentor Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22813
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21632
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gill
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv16916
Plaintiff:
Maurya Gill and Kenny Gill
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv16716
Plaintiff:
Cheri Gill and David Gill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11173
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K. Gill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09514
Plaintiff:
Velma Gill and Cody Gill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07751
Plaintiff:
Martha B. Gill and Leo S. Gill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
