Cases 11 - 20 of 279
Barker et al v. Naik et al
as 2:2017cv04387
Plaintiff:
John Barker , Brenda Barker and Samantha Wilkinson
Defendant:
Saurabh Naik , International Export Import, Inc. , Surnaik Holdings of WV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neece et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03337
Plaintiff:
Olivia Neece , Jocelyn Aldridge , Theresa Anderson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03138
Plaintiff:
JoEllen Greene
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv02714
Plaintiff:
Robert Green
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02306
Plaintiff:
Judith Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy-Green et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ann Kennedy-Green and James L. Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01916
Plaintiff:
Joy Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00923
Plaintiff:
Devora Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Marlene L. Green
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
