Cases 11 - 20 of 24
LUCAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12119
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07122
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45469
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID BRYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15481
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID LANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEGLOMINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89690
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID DEGLOMINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv05458
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID DUTTON and CATHERINE BROOKE DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv48871
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID CUPANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40098
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABSHIRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25442
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID ABSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Rooks
as 1:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
Yong H. Jones
Defendant:
Jason David Rooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
