Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Amick vs KMS Freight Corp et al
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Darren Amick
Defendant:
KMS Freight Corp and Carlos Delgado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2016cv00854
Defendant:
KM Trucking, Mast Trucking Inc. and Charles Rodgers
Plaintiff:
Sherene Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mike Kaplun, individually and d/b/a KMS Development et al v. Cadle Company, The
as 1:2016cv01901
Plaintiff:
Mike Kaplun and KMS Development, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadle Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2015cv07376
Defendant:
KM Trucking, Mast Trucking Inc. and Charles Rodgers
Plaintiff:
Sherene Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
YOO et al v. HARMON et al
as 2:2015cv07136
Plaintiff:
MISUN YOO , MOON KYUNG KM and IL S. JUNG
Defendant:
ARTHUR HARMON , FULTON BANK, N.A. , ROSELL N. RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Langley v. KM Express Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02436
Defendant:
KM Express Inc. and Kern Randy Modeste
Plaintiff:
Michael Langley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brewer et al v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Cecily Brewer , Kevin Moore , KM Jr and others
Defendant:
Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. and Suzuki Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Schrock v. Greiner et al
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Eli Schrock
Defendant:
James Greiner , David White , Kalona Sales Barn, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Greiner et al
as 3:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Dale Cox
Defendant:
James Greiner, David White, Kalona Sales Barn, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Routt et al v. Stephens et al
as 1:2012cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kenton Routt and Robin Routt
Defendant:
John A Stephens , David Falcon , KM Karriers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
