Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Evans, et al v. PMT Express, LLC, et al
as 4:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Bessie Evans and S.H.
Defendant:
PMT Express, LLC , Paul Miller Trucking, Inc. and James Philip Myers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Myers v. Nealey
as 5:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sir Richard Myers
Defendant:
Gary Wayne Nealey and Dumas Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
BELL et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00874
Plaintiff:
VIRGIE BELL , JOANN BEVERLY , MELVIN D. CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fortenberry v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2010cv00193
Plaintiff:
Martha Anthony Fortenberry
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Richard Myers, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Richard Myers and The Estate of Gail Myers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Realty Company and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MYERS v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00540
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LEE MYERS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Myers v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Vera W. Myers
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MYERS et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
BENNY DALE MYERS and ELLEN H. MYERS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.
Cross Defendant:
FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION, GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
