Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Bologna et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31520
Plaintiff:
Socorro Bologna and Randolph Bologna
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29583
Plaintiff:
Therill Seldom Randolph, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huertas et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv27947
Plaintiff:
Imelda Huertas and Randolph Huertas
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24938
Plaintiff:
Charles Leroy Randolph
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stuart et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv24807
Plaintiff:
Monica Stuart and Randolph Lewis Stuart
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24059
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Randolph and George Randolph
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15786
Plaintiff:
Angela Phillips and Randolph S. Phillips
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seiler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14172
Plaintiff:
Deborah Seiler and Randolph Seiler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14004
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Randolph
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv04770
Plaintiff:
Randy D. Randolph
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
