Torts - Injury Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 357
Everts v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: William Everts
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Reginald Randolph Williams
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Christian v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: William David Christian, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
LeRoy v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: William LeRoy
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Bardge v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff: William Alvin Bardge
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Donail Williams
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Eskew v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: William D. Eskew
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01528
Plaintiff: William Wayne Smith
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00674
Defendant: Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff: Celeea Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff: ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant: SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?