Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Sweeting v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corection, Remish, Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sweeting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faber v. PNA Transport, LLC., et al.
as 1:2019cv00849
Defendant:
Derrick Davis, Jennifer Albanna, Taha Albanna and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator Jirawan S. Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutchinson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00756
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madry v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derrick Madry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schramm v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01804
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derrick Schramm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Justice v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Derrick Justice
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jones v. Beilharz
as 3:2016cv02339
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jones
Defendant:
Kent S. Beilharz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22155
Plaintiff:
Derrick Watson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , DePuy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick v. Boehringer Ighelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00511
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Derrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 1:2012dp21687
Plaintiff:
Derrick Taylor
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
