Cases 21 - 27 of 27
MOORE et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67964
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE MOORE and WILLIAM F. MOORE
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77435
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE F. MOORE, MARIANNE F. MOORE, WENDELL MOORE and others
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MOORE et al v. H.K. PORTER CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73828
Plaintiff:
MARGIE F. MOORE and EARL BEHR
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER CO., INC., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Moore v. Patel et al
as 3:2008cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lashundra F. Moore and Lashundra F. Moore
Defendant:
Anil Patel, Sleep Inn Hotel, Choice Hotels International and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOORE v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65738
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL F. MOORE
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MOORE et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61148
Plaintiff:
ALEX F MOORE, SR and MELINDA MOORE
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, UNIROYAL INC, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRY INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In Re Bextra and Celebrex Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2005md01699
Plaintiff:
Josephine Frias, Israel Cantu, Diane Actkinson and others
Defendant:
Clarence Brooks, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Pharmacia & UpJohn Company, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Eduvigis Diaz Diaz
Other:
Diane Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
