Cases 21 - 28 of 28
CAIN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CAIN , AUSTIN RODDEN , BROOKE TOMPKINS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CORTEZ GRAHAM
Defendant:
WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC. , FREEWAY FOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Miller et al v. Soumare et al
as 3:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Richard Freeman Miller and Joann Miller
Defendant:
Soundoun Soumare and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
EDWARDS, EXECUTRIX et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00426
Plaintiff:
JEAN FREEMAN EDWARDS, EXECUTRIX and ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. EDWARDS, DECEASED
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Freeman et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Maurice Freeman and Linda S. Freeman
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Freeman et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Harvey Stanley Freeman and Martha D. Freeman
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Freeman v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00195
Plaintiff:
Waunda Freeman and Waunda Freeman
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Thompson, et al v. St. Paul Travelers
as 5:2004cv00342
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hazard, Vincent James Gugliemo, Berta Cortan and others
Defendant:
St. Paul Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
