Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Parrott et al v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2019cv00019
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Marlin Parrott, Monte Parrott, Monte and Tabatha Parrott, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grillo v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv01502
Defendant:
AUSA Jeffrey B Jensen, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States of America, Acting Through the United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Doriana Grillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Vaughn vs. United States Postal Service
as 2:2018cv04181
Plaintiff:
John C. Vaughn
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Flowers v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2017cv01028
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Craig Picard
Plaintiff:
Rachel Flowers
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Means v. Walker et al
as 6:2016cv03031
Plaintiff:
Paul D Means
Defendant:
Zachary W. Walker and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moberg v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2014cv04233
Plaintiff:
Lyman K Moberg
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hogan v. U.S. Postal Service
as 4:2012cv02040
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Hogan
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
AAA Missouri Insurance Company et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv01572
Defendant:
United States of America, Maurice Boyd and United States of America Postal Service
Plaintiff:
AAA Missouri Insurance Company and Alfredo Hasson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Reece v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2012cv01566
Plaintiff:
Richelle Reece
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hayden v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2011cv04172
Plaintiff:
Charles Hayden
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
