Cases 21 - 30 of 229
Stark County, Ohio Board of County Commissioners et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46340
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma, Inc., The State of Ohio ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney of Stark County, John D. Ferrero, Stark County, Ohio Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
County of Portage, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45993
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Jane Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
City of Ravenna, Ohio, The State of Ohio ex rel., City of Kent, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
County of Medina, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45839
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Medina, Ohio and The State of Ohio ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney of Medina County, S. Forrest Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Montgomery County Board of County Commissioners et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46080
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County Board of County Commissioners and State of Ohio ex rel. Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant:
National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor:
USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master:
Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent:
Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant:
Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae:
Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner:
Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Estate of Bruce Brockel, Deceased, by and through Donna Brockel, as Personal Representative v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2021op45089
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Bruce Brockel, Deceased, by and through Donna Brockel, as Personal Representative
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., KVK-Tech, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. and others
Laborers' District Council Building and Construction Health and Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45019
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., purdue pharma l.p and others
Plaintiff:
Laborers' District Council Building and Construction Health and Welfare Fund
District Attorney of Clearfield County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45022
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
District Attorney Of Clearfield County
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Health Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2021op45025
Defendant:
purdue pharma l.p, Walgreen Co, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Health Fund
Lower Makefield Township v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2020op45284
Defendant:
purdue pharma l.p, Walgreen Co, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
